Anger and Apples
Sep. 23rd, 2010 10:30 am
Yay, McIntosh season! The delicious red-and-green kind. Not the white technological kind.
I'm addicted to McIntosh apples. Whenever the season rolls in, Isa is all like "Om nom nom appples apples apples pie apples"
Unfortunately for me, I have a wound in my mouth is seems. I'm not sure what it is. It's rather painful and looks like a zit, but on the gums. According to Link, it's really common. I've never had something like that, but he seems to have gotten a lot. He told me to rince my mouth with salt water 4 or so times a day. When I first did that, it hurted like hell, but now the pain is going down, so I guess it's working. Or my jaw is being zombified.
So yeah. Put a little damper in my entousiasm since apple acid + mouth wound = ouchies. Still, APPLES. Yaaaaay. *Is excited for the silliest things*
In other news, Terry Pratchet rocks my socks. He's channelling his inner-Sokka by getting himself a shiny meteorite sword.
Pratchet, stop making me jealous of not being you.
Finally, about NSFW (Not safe for work - aka sexy - art) :
Another friend of mine had posted a while back a really beautiful "How to Train your Dragon" fanart. The fanart showed Hiccup and Astrid nuzzling (as in "rubbing noses") while being partially covered by a fur-carpet-thing. It was implied pretty clearly that the characters were in the nude. But it was not sexualized. It was a really soft and cute piece. The art piece got tagged as offensive by a few deviants and eventually the friend was banned.
It's weird. That friend, and torreadora, seem to be getting this not because of the contente itself, but because they are using copyrighted characters (Disney and Dreamworks). As much as I get that some people may find their childhood menaced by this, the work of both these artists was far from tasteless. The art itself was gorgeous, and even the very sexualized pieces had a feel of "nice" and "loving" and were drawn in good taste. I've seen artwork on deviant art showing the same characters in more "depraved" settings (read : rape art) and nobody says a thing. I think these two artist were aimed at because of the quality of the drawing. They have proportions and expressions down to a t. It looked realistic and was therefore menacing, Or something. I don't even know.
This kinda just confirms something i've always disliked about Deviant art. Don't use it to determine your quality as an artist.
A lot of bad artists get a lot of favorites and a lot of good art gets pinned as awful or ignored. I say there's nothing bad about something a bit risqué, especially when it's done in good taste. When you can truly feel the love poured in the work and the love between the characters.
-Isa
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 04:32 pm (UTC)Funny you should mention that - my grandparents own a small apple orchard. They sell quite a few types - I can't recall the full list, but the most popular are Lobos, Honey Golds, Cortlands...
...and McIntosh apples. Suffice to say, if you want some...
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 05:03 pm (UTC)Sounds like you got a cold sore, although in my family we call them canker sores. I tend to get them a lot since sharp teeth + soft flesh is not a good combination. Really, any sort of scratch or sore spot in your mouth will become a canker sore, so take care when you eat. And maybe, just maybe, the apples had too much acid for your mouth to survive that assault of deliciousness. ^_-
I'd not be surprised if people who reported the artists were either jealous of the talent, or thought they had somehow copied legit art. (Legit nude Disney art? Really? Who broke into an animator's private sketches?!) My sister never drew nude art back in the day, but she always got reported for copying art when she was drawing original characters in the Sonic art style. It was really silly... And people are silly... I don't make it a point to seek out such artwork myself, tasteless or not, but I'd never report such people, either. Why discipline an artist for being talented?
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 05:46 pm (UTC)(My corsetress made that custom for me.)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 08:21 pm (UTC)Oh my God, I feel your apple love. That's something I miss about living in Ohio. Every fall, the fruits and veggies made me fall in love. Whither goest thou, Pumpkin Patch?
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 08:59 pm (UTC)I shall remember this information if I ever visit you and Joanne.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 09:47 pm (UTC)Grr... the art issue makes me vicariously angry. Once and a while, there are ridiculously blatant pics on DA that have little or no artistic value. What you described is nothing compared to some of them. Unfortunately, if it's a fanart tagged for copyright issues there's nothing that can be done - but realistically, DA should realize if they're going to take works down for that issue, they would end up losing 90% of their library.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 12:27 am (UTC)Too bad we can't go apple picking as a group. I bet it would be more fun then.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 12:30 am (UTC)And the corset ain't bad either!
no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 12:33 am (UTC)People definitely need to mature. Bad, people, bad!
I can't wait for clementine season too. Oh fruits, the candy from the forest! :D
no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 12:38 am (UTC)I hate people who tag stuff for copyright issues because they hate something about it. It's like...hypocrite much!?
no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 12:38 am (UTC)Not much of it though. Just the books with death.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 12:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 01:42 am (UTC)Heck, i've seen "stock photos" that were basically porn and Yaoi images that were in about the same poses!!
I didn't know I had my DA account set up to view all contents because I'd see pictures I'd rather not remember on the front page and I'd go "sdhahdjgkajsdl!!! Why does DA allow people to post this kind of stuff??!!"
More than once I was scarred for life from those pictures x_XIf those kinds of images are allowed on DA it seems hypocritical that something sensual and mildly sexual would be banned. From what you're saying, I wonder if people affiliated with the studios have something to do with this,i.e. banning good, sensual images because it might be mistaken as works from the animators themselves?no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 05:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 01:18 pm (UTC)Don't get me started on the rape pictures. Or those "let's draw the characters overweight" pictures. Why are those so popular?
no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 01:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 01:28 pm (UTC)I don't think it would be someone from the studios (is anything, animators may like it and the Disney censorship committee probably has better things to do then churn thru D.A.) From what these two artists have described, it was just deviants who seemed to think they were upholding some kind of morality. I guess sensuality is scarier than outright porn to them (oh noes! They love each other! And their naughty bits are covered! AAaaaa!)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 01:32 pm (UTC)Thanks
(She's making me a corset to match the butterfly camo)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 01:33 pm (UTC);)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 01:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 01:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 10:37 pm (UTC)Ugh. Who knew that "morbidly obese cartoon women" was such a huge fetish? O_o
no subject
Date: 2010-09-25 02:40 am (UTC)And I have seen the art that Lily posted that you're referring too. It's strange though that people raise such a stink about it when I've seen images of women's hoo-has on the front page. I'm not bothered too much by sensual art because most of the time it's presented in a tasteful way. I'm not too keen on straight up porn, but there are those of us who do know the difference...
no subject
Date: 2010-09-25 02:43 am (UTC)/fangirl squee
no subject
Date: 2010-09-26 07:31 pm (UTC)And woot to apples and apple pies! :P You've never had a canker sore before? That is odd :P
no subject
Date: 2010-09-26 09:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 09:37 pm (UTC)