Gender roles continue
Apr. 1st, 2008 09:51 amIn the Oz books, at some point, Ozma's emerald city is attacked by an army of girls lead by their fearless leader, the powerful Jinjur, also a girl. Oz is all about women in power facing other women in power.
The reality is still not at that point. Continuing on the idea I wrote last time that men seemed more freed by gender role changes then women, I saw an article today with this in it:
It's a 1938 disney rejection letter saying that :
"Women do not do any of the creative work in connection with preparing the cartoons for the screen, as that work is performed entirely by young men. For this reason girls are not considered for the training school.
The only work open to women consists of tracing the characters on clear celluloid sheets with India ink and filling in the tracings on the reverse side with paint according to the directions."
Wow, good thing today is different! Well, according to an article about this letter, In Ratatouille, among the 26 head animators there is no women. Now you wonder, is it because women are not interested in animation, or because those who are perform less well then men or simply because those who are interest get disapointed by the boys club that seem to be living in animation studios. I remember visiting Funbag animation when I was 17, in the context of an internship. The guy that had brought me into Funbag told me later "Wow, their boss told me you distracted them a lot and a lot of employees complained they could not work."
Could not work because of an (underage to boot!) one-day-only female coworker? Sheesh.
I guess I understand that, if woman are rare in the animation world, it's normal that they may be distracting, but that made me feel like a zoo animal. So I really wonder about the animation world, and the comic book world and the commercial art world in general, who's greater members (sic) are still men. This brings us back to Linda Nochlin's text "why is there no great woman artist?" who says that their is no woman artists (at least back in the 1970s) because most of the art world did not always reject openly women, but rather made it difficult for them and opened easier "girlier" jobs for them instead. Boy, that reminds me of the whole disney inker versus animator right?
I know the world today is a lot less like that, and that one of the reasons women aren't in animation is because of a lack of interest. But that lack of interest is caused by something, and it might not be the competitive atmosphere or the horrible hours because women choose jobs that have those too. Maybe it's because there has always been so little woman that woman are discouraged. When your class teacher must warn the class to leave women alone or your internship boss tells your mentor you're distracting his employees... Is that really all that encouraging?
Yeah, this text is feminist and borderline sexist towards men. Too bad. I'm feeling female fury today.
-Secondlina
EDIT: Check out http://ichiban-victory.livejournal.com/447109.html?view=3085957#t3085957
Ichiban Victory does an awesome little post that sheds a bit of light on the stuff said in this one. It complements my super feminist rant with a more moderate point of view! Plz read :)
(I love her post!)
The reality is still not at that point. Continuing on the idea I wrote last time that men seemed more freed by gender role changes then women, I saw an article today with this in it:
It's a 1938 disney rejection letter saying that :
"Women do not do any of the creative work in connection with preparing the cartoons for the screen, as that work is performed entirely by young men. For this reason girls are not considered for the training school.
The only work open to women consists of tracing the characters on clear celluloid sheets with India ink and filling in the tracings on the reverse side with paint according to the directions."
Wow, good thing today is different! Well, according to an article about this letter, In Ratatouille, among the 26 head animators there is no women. Now you wonder, is it because women are not interested in animation, or because those who are perform less well then men or simply because those who are interest get disapointed by the boys club that seem to be living in animation studios. I remember visiting Funbag animation when I was 17, in the context of an internship. The guy that had brought me into Funbag told me later "Wow, their boss told me you distracted them a lot and a lot of employees complained they could not work."
Could not work because of an (underage to boot!) one-day-only female coworker? Sheesh.
I guess I understand that, if woman are rare in the animation world, it's normal that they may be distracting, but that made me feel like a zoo animal. So I really wonder about the animation world, and the comic book world and the commercial art world in general, who's greater members (sic) are still men. This brings us back to Linda Nochlin's text "why is there no great woman artist?" who says that their is no woman artists (at least back in the 1970s) because most of the art world did not always reject openly women, but rather made it difficult for them and opened easier "girlier" jobs for them instead. Boy, that reminds me of the whole disney inker versus animator right?
I know the world today is a lot less like that, and that one of the reasons women aren't in animation is because of a lack of interest. But that lack of interest is caused by something, and it might not be the competitive atmosphere or the horrible hours because women choose jobs that have those too. Maybe it's because there has always been so little woman that woman are discouraged. When your class teacher must warn the class to leave women alone or your internship boss tells your mentor you're distracting his employees... Is that really all that encouraging?
Yeah, this text is feminist and borderline sexist towards men. Too bad. I'm feeling female fury today.
-Secondlina
EDIT: Check out http://ichiban-victory.livejournal.com/447109.html?view=3085957#t3085957
Ichiban Victory does an awesome little post that sheds a bit of light on the stuff said in this one. It complements my super feminist rant with a more moderate point of view! Plz read :)
(I love her post!)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 02:52 pm (UTC)Just as long as we all keep listening to each other, and open doors for each other, we'll keep making progress.
If you are not following the career of
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 03:13 pm (UTC)Looks like the feminist movement is far from over.
Thanks for sharing. ^^
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 03:34 pm (UTC)I know women exist in the field today (some of the higher ups at Disney or even Pixar are in fact female), but they are still very few and far between the men. I'm still hoping to break into that world someday myself, so perhaps at some point I'll also have a peek into what goes on behind the scenes.
I don't know whether we can solely blame this on men when so many women seem put off by pursuing creative endeavors. I'm hoping we see a change in this, but sitting back and waiting isn't the way to do it.
(And if those men were distracted by you walking in, that's pretty sad. People from either gender need to learn to keep their stupid hormones in check. We have one guy in my sewing class, with at least fifteen girls, and he's pretty much just another one of the people who goes to class every day to finish a project. I've yet to see anyone get distracted by his presence, and he's on the cute side as well. *shrug*
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 04:01 pm (UTC)Don't forget to read the Linda Nochlin text! I know for a fact you'll love it! :)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 04:05 pm (UTC)*SWEARS HEAVILY*
Replaced by a Xerox. Unbelievable.
I see a lot of women being put off by creative endaveors, but i'm wondering what puts them off. As an example, Pia Gerra (illustrator for the comic Y the last man) could not find any contracts because she "drew like a girl" (which is not true at all! What is "drawing like a girl" anyways?!) I'm thinking the whole to interest in art/animation is caused by social rules and such. It's also caused a bit by the feminist movement. Women should get business jobs to be equal to men! However, women equality is still low in the art and needs changing!
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 04:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 04:43 pm (UTC)You think the art world would be more progressive about this sort of thing. It should be more about actual talent rather than gender.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 04:45 pm (UTC)I've know two people who are both animators -
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 04:52 pm (UTC)It wouldn't be a fix for the problems of other companies and the rest of the industry, but it might show them up.
A start to that is the Indy comic industry. Most of my favorite cartoonists are female. But for some reason, they aren't as prolific or persistent or well known as the men (except perhaps Dylan Meconis or Ursula Vernon), which might be the result of any number of social influences (even factors outside the industry, like housekeeping expectations). But here's my reading list:
Alison Bechdel http://www.dykestowatchoutfor.com/
Tracy J. Butler http://lackadaisy.foxprints.com/
And, of course
There are so many more, of course, and any one of them of high enough quality to have their work animated (many of which I'd like to see animated – your own work included).
I'm not likely to go into animation myself, but if I were and did make it to a decision-making level, I'd tap that talent. I'd make it my goal.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 05:08 pm (UTC)I mentioned the glass ceiling because I picked up an animation magazine that was lying around while at Espresso and it listed wages for various roles. For some reason female animation directors got paid less than male ones.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 05:53 pm (UTC)wow, that letter certainly is ridiculous. things have changed in the industry for sure, but that glass ceiling is definitely still around. i have a few friends who are animation students right now at Digipen, CalArts, Sheridan and SCAD, and from what I've gleaned from them it seems like there are as many or more competent female animation STUDENTS in their programs, so it will be interesting to see in 3-4 years after they have all graduated how the job market ends up being. it sucks that you got treated that way at Funbag, that's really inappropriate that the presence of a 17 year old girl apparently interests them so much that they can't get any work done.
*edit: SCAD, not ringling
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 05:53 pm (UTC)Katie Rice: http://funnycute.blogspot.com
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 05:58 pm (UTC)It's also important to remember that it was the 1930s, and the world was a far different place. It wasn't really until World War 2 shipped off most of our 'American boys' that women were appreciated for being able to labor, and in fact were encouraged to enter the work force. (Just check out propaganda posters like Rosie the Riveter.) Heck, even the fashion industry trends focused on this, women's apparel finally going more toward business apparel for the working woman.
(Guess who's been paying attention in class this semester? XP)
We still have a lot of barriers to break down, it's true, as well as knocking sense into those who think that the gender of a person determines their abilities, and what people will want. I do find it somewhat strange that in places like Japan, where women are still pretty much second-class citizens, that female artists are everywhere you look. I think we need to take a page from such societies, not in treating women as less than men, but in seeing women as equals when it comes to talents and the like.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 06:09 pm (UTC)I also forgot another friend of mine who's cartooning I admire but who doesn't do much in comics these days:
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 06:11 pm (UTC)I work in the lightind department at DreamWorks and we have very few females here compared to some other departments. That's because lighting is mostly technical. There are just some fields of work more dominated by women than others. If you have any other questions on the subject, I'd be happy to answer them for you.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 06:23 pm (UTC)If anything it reflects how unprofessional THEY are.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 06:37 pm (UTC)I currently work for an independent weekly where the managing editor, Sheri, is a woman. And she's a damn good manager, too. And the office dynamic is really dynamite: laid back, positive and productive. We can't blame that all on her, since Deb, the receptionist, is also key to that atmosphere along with Peter, the publisher. But we all listen to Sheri and she makes the final decisions on what goes to print. Period. And she's a real pleasure to work for.
And together, we're beginning to really eat up the local daily.
There's hope there, I think.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 06:44 pm (UTC)Now, I know you know more of the comic industry then I do, but when I compare the North American comics to the Japanese comics, finding female artists is a lot more common in manga. I can't help but think that because of this manga offers more varity, especially for girls, then a lot of North American comics and thus makes it more popular cause there are stories that appeal to both boys and girls. You would think this would be a hint to the western comic industry that lenting in more female comic artists would be a very good move to take.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 06:45 pm (UTC)I myself am planing to start a "serious" (hum hum yeah) webcomic soon, so you,ll be able to add me to your list :)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 06:46 pm (UTC)Then again, a lot of them were barely older then me and most likely not that mature.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 06:49 pm (UTC)I specifically work on a smaller segment of the local daily that is actually a weekly. I design two publications geared toward towns within our coverage area. There's another designer who handles the third zone.
I agree that things are changing so quickly, especially in the past few years. Newspapers are making the shift to become either hyper local (think Gannett and their 24/7 newsrooms) or becoming more magazine-like. I do a lot more alternative and magazine-type design than I did in the past, and I'm in the beginning stages of learning Flash to make the designs work better with online.
Our dynamic is largely positive, though we have had a round of layoffs in our newsroom recently and that has added to the tension in there.