![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
BEHOLD : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSx1dYJlJh4
As always, the animation looks great. There seems to be a strong focus on the male character. Probably to attract a male audience. I get the feeling that by creating a dashing thief, there just gonna attract more girls...
- Isa
As always, the animation looks great. There seems to be a strong focus on the male character. Probably to attract a male audience. I get the feeling that by creating a dashing thief, there just gonna attract more girls...
- Isa
no subject
Date: 2010-06-13 03:07 pm (UTC)And it doesn't hurt that the dashing thief is...very dashing. Like you said. Attracting a male audience? Yeeeah... xD
no subject
Date: 2010-06-13 03:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-13 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-13 04:28 pm (UTC)But yes, it looks like fun and the animation is pretty amazing. The thief's voice actor sounds familiar too.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-13 05:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-13 05:51 pm (UTC)On the other hand, if Disney wanted to pander to an older age group of men, it would focus on making the female lead more 'hot', ala Jessica Rabbit. It scares me that men still drool after her despite how many years it's been since Who Framed Roger Rabbit was released. I don't think using sex appeal to draw in the male population is the way to go, however, at least not for the Disney label.
(Anyway, I saw the trailer the other day but didn't have a chance to post it up. Even though I prefer Disney's traditional animation, I love how Disney has made it a point to insert traditional animation techniques, such as squash and stretch, to its CGI movies. It makes movies like Shrek look very stiff and boring by comparison. ...at least to me.)
no subject
Date: 2010-06-13 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-13 07:37 pm (UTC)Hmm, I think Disney might've just found a way into my wallet. XD
no subject
Date: 2010-06-13 09:27 pm (UTC):(
no subject
Date: 2010-06-13 09:29 pm (UTC)It makes movies like Shrek look very stiff and boring by comparison. ...at least to me.
WORD
to both of those comments
no subject
Date: 2010-06-13 09:44 pm (UTC)(Edit: This movie was in the works while Pixar and Disney were having a falling out, so at the time Disney was pushing CGI. It would probably destroy too much work to start all over with traditional animation.)
no subject
Date: 2010-06-13 09:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-13 11:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-13 11:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-14 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-14 12:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-14 01:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-14 01:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-14 01:03 am (UTC)I wonder who plays him *goes to check*
no subject
Date: 2010-06-14 01:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-14 01:07 am (UTC)I'm all for more active heroes too, but I doubt this type of hero will attract more males in the audience. I think they should go more towards characters like Hiccup, or Jim, or aladdin, as you said. This guy seems way to dashing.
I like both computer and traditional. I find both can bring out something that the other can't. Like light. Lighting is quite unique in 3D animation. However, traditional still has the more artistic edge.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-14 01:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-14 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-14 01:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-14 01:11 am (UTC)