Obsession with skulls?
Aug. 2nd, 2010 12:12 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Whew. I managed to finish the first ten pages of my printed comic Psychopompes. The first ten pages are needed for a preview magazine. So, that's a whole week to sketch, ink, shade and letter 10 pages. Didn't think I could do it, but I did. I spent my vacation on this. Tired now. I'm happy with the result.
I can't show you guys the actual pages. But here's a few select panels from those pages, just so I can show off a bit.

Aside from that, i'm loving all the Tangled (Disney's "Rapunzel") concept art all over the internet. Behold :




As always, Disney knows how to do expressions. I love it. I hope the artbook for this movie will be instructive. Pixar artbook tend to be a bit meh. I,m hoping the Disney 3D animated feature ones might be better. You can learn a lot from artbooks.
- Isa
I can't show you guys the actual pages. But here's a few select panels from those pages, just so I can show off a bit.

Aside from that, i'm loving all the Tangled (Disney's "Rapunzel") concept art all over the internet. Behold :




As always, Disney knows how to do expressions. I love it. I hope the artbook for this movie will be instructive. Pixar artbook tend to be a bit meh. I,m hoping the Disney 3D animated feature ones might be better. You can learn a lot from artbooks.
- Isa
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 04:25 am (UTC)And now I feel bad... I knew of this concept art, but I guess since I've been gone for a few days it's not like I could tell you about it. Agreed on Disney and expressions. This reminds me when I saw the Bolt concept art on display in Florida. It was so great to see! It made me wish the movie had been traditionally animated... I feel the same about Tangled, but from what little I've seen I don't doubt it will be well animated for CG.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 03:39 pm (UTC)Disney animators always give out their all to stylize a piece and bring out a high quality work. I still think CG offers possibilities that traditional animation cannot. The hair for example. It's really hard to animate consistently hair, especially when it moves that much. It's like the flight scenes in How to train your dragon. Sure, traditional animation would have been fun, but the scenes acquire a certain realism and flow from the 3D animation.
A style needs to go with a story, and I think Tangled is a good candidate for 3D animation. Something like "The princess and the frog" or "beauty and the beast" would have looked odd in 3D. I'm not saying that I prefer 3D to traditional, but I don't think they would have done Tangled is the 3D medium was not available.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 04:22 pm (UTC)I do think that any movie could and can be made traditionally. All that computer animation holds over it is more dynamic camera angles and realistic renders.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 05:07 pm (UTC)Hair was difficult to replicate, but they now developed a lot of awesome tools to make it. Pocahontas' hair is cool, but it's a very simplified design (black blob with escaping strands, it does look cool but it's very simple). I don't think Rapunzel would have looked cool with Pocahontas hair. There's definitely something I love about the way they did her hair in 3D.
I don't think the Disney "3D studios" are as strong as Pixar yet, and you can't compare a developing studio to a well established one. So yeah, their 3D might seem a lot weaker then their 2D, but I still think they are doing good.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 05:49 pm (UTC)And yeah....I could chomp at this all day, but I won't. I'm not arguing about this since I was never against 3D/CGI animation in the first place. Both have strengths and weaknesses, neither is truly superior to the other.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 06:44 pm (UTC)I'm not so well versed in the ways of Disney (not as much as you anyways), but i'm still happy about the 3D. Yeah, we could have a debate about traditional vs CGI until we are old and gray and still not resolve the debate. I'm sure Disney has a reason why they chose 3D for this movie. Snow Queen seems to still be in 2-D despite jumping in and out of development hell. Any new developments on that movie? Since the snow Queen is my favorite fairy tale I have high hopes for this one.
Hey, how about the Bear and the Bow? Are you excited about that one? I am! the main character looks like she could kick butt.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 07:06 pm (UTC)From what I read, Glen Keane pushed for Tangled to be in 3D, not for it being 3D, but because he wanted to make a movie that looked "like a moving oil painting", which is much cheaper to do with CGI than traditional animation. For one they can render it on a computer. For the other, they'd have to actually paint it.
I'm always really neutral on Pixar movies until I see them. I'm the same with Disney movies, too. Until I can see even a snippet of a scene from the movie, I try not to have any prejudice for or against the movie until it's out. I loved Toy Story after thinking, "How dumb!" when I initially heard of it, but I also didn't really care for A Bug's Life. In this rare situation, I need to "see it" before I'll "believe it". ^_-;
I've not heard anything on Disney's projects, but that's not unusual. Disney has always been secretive on what it works on. When Disney is ready to let us know what's in production, they'll let us know. When they feel they can make a worthy movie adaptation of the Snow Queen, it'll happen.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 12:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 03:40 pm (UTC)Swasbucking dashing thieves are girl bait anyways.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 07:33 am (UTC)Disney does awesome expressions! I loves them so! =D This flick looks very fun ;)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 03:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 09:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 03:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 10:11 am (UTC)I hear what you say about Disney expressions. The thing I noticed about Disney versus Don Bluth's style, for example, was that in Disney you can take ANY still of a character and it will be flattering to the character; with Bluth there are a LOT of in-between ugly expressions.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 03:44 pm (UTC)I'll keep you guys posted for sure! :D
Ah, Bluth. I actually like his more "icky" style. Disney seems a little too clean nowadays. But it is their style to have really neat animation. And pale lines. Bluth likes his fumbling and black lines. I wish Bluth sticked to his dark style rather then try to copy Disney.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 01:20 pm (UTC)Concept sketches yay! I see icon potential for some of these. Disney does do expressions well. I can't wait to see this movie.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 03:45 pm (UTC)Thanks! It took me about 3 days to shade it all (started almost right after you guys left and finished yesterday around 2 am. Whew!)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 03:03 am (UTC)I still wish Tangled was a 2D movie -_______________-
no subject
Date: 2010-08-06 05:18 pm (UTC)I do love Disney's expressions, especially the one where she's feeding the horse. xD
no subject
Date: 2010-08-06 05:34 pm (UTC)Gah, the expressions! SO AMAZING.